Born in Philadelphia,
Charles Sheeler attended the School of Industrial
Art (1900-1903) and the Pennsylvania Academy
of the Fine Arts (1903-1906), studying with
the William Merritt Chase. With a fellow student,
Morton Schamberg, Sheeler set up a studio in
Philadelphia in 1908. In Europe the next year,
he and Schamberg were impressed by the elegant
formalism of the Italian Renaissance painters.
In Paris they experienced some of the ferment
of modernism and saw the radical manifestations
of Pablo Picasso's and Georges Braque's analytical
cubism and the Fauve expressionism of Henri
Matisse's painting. After this trip Sheeler
devoted himself to working in essentially analytical
styles."
Modern American Charles Sheeler was born in
Philadelphia and studied in the School of Industrial
Art and the Pennsylvania Academy of Fine Art
in Philadelphia. Although he supported himself
at that time as an architectural photographer,
he dabbled in painting on weekends.
During the 1920s, Sheeler was associated with
a group of painters called the Precisionists,
known for their realistic style of painting.
He focused strongly on industrial subjects and
was a distinguished photographer of machines.
He perfected a method of achieving a photographic
quality with paint. Even when he painted in
an abstract style he was still concerned with
achieving absolute accuracy and exactness in
his art.
The work of American painter Charles Sheeler
is, in its pragmatic association with the American
scene and its consistently lucid technique,
central to the precisionist style. His techniques
varied from photographic realism to modified
abstraction.
A More Indepth View of Sheeler's Life
Charles Sheeler's photographs and paintings
of urban and industrial scenes revealed his
interest in the formal vocabulary of Cubism.
He worked for “advertising agencies (particularly
for Ford plants) and collaborated with fashion
magazines, while his painting developed into
an increasingly "immaculate" rendering
(www.bookrags.com). After 1932, he gave up photography,
using it solely as a model thereafter. His paintings
and drawings “are characterized by a formal
simplification, an impersonal style, and a precision
of the brushstroke, somewhat close to Demuth”
(Lucic 21). Sheeler described the heartland
of America, without falling victim to regionalist
isolation. His paintings of factories, Pennsylvania
farms, and Shaker furniture reflected his desire
to glorify a kind of progress specific to America,
where mechanical progress followed tradition.
In 1938, Charles Sheeler was commissioned by
Fortune magazine to produce six paintings extolling
America's industrial power. Sheeler visited
power stations across the nation, photographing
selected sites which became the basis for the
paintings.' These paintings, known collectively
as Power, were reproduced in a “portfolio
supplement to the December, 1940, issue of Fortune
and exhibited from December 2 to December 21,
1940 at Edith Halpert's Downtown Gallery”
(Lucic 20). The text of the Power portfolio
claimed that Sheeler depicted machines not as
"strange, inhuman masses of material, but
exquisite manifestations of human reason,"
because the machine was to the present what
the figure had been to the Renaissance.
Steam Turbine, the fifth in the series, was
based on one of the turbines at the Hudson Avenue
Station of the Brooklyn Edison Company, New
York, and then the world's largest steam power
plant. The curving, steam-filled loop dominates
the composition; in the foreground are other
machines such as heat exchangers, pumps, and
automatic valves. Sheeler concentrated on the
“geometric perfection and implicit power
of the forms” (Lucic 12), as he had done
since his first big industrial commission, photographing
Henry Ford's River Rouge Plant outside Detroit,
in 1927. However, in 1912, after studying at
the School of Industrial Art and the Pennsylvania
Academy of the Fine Arts in Philadelphia, he
began to support himself as an architectural
photographer in 1928; Sheeler was commissioned
to photograph the ocean liner, the US.S. Majestic.
His work, Upper Deck (1929, Harvard University
Art Museums, Fogg Art Museum), based on that
photograph, was a turning point because, for
the first time, Sheeler discovered how to achieve
photographic qualities in paint. As he later
recalled, "Starting with Upper Deck I have
sought to have a complete conception of the
picture established in my mind, much as the
architect completes his plans before the work
of bringing the house into existence begins
Sheeler consciously “sought an architectural
structure and an impersonal surface, devoid
of temperamental slashes of paint or layers
suggesting sequences of time” (Lucic 23).
He wanted to eliminate "the means to the
end, meaning the technique as far as possible
and to present the subject in itself without
the distraction of the means of achieving it
. But in Sheeler's best paintings, the impersonal
surface shimmers; it is like a still reflection
in a pond, not just a reflection of a single,
unified image but an image of concentration.
In Steam Turbine, the “precision of the
geometric structure, the subtlety of the paint
surface, and the nuances of color simultaneously
convey both the information of a photograph
and the qualities” of a painting (Lucic
12). Critics were not always pleased with the
obvious relationship between photographs and
paintings in Sheeler's work. Milton Brown, perhaps
his strongest critic, noted in his review of
the Power series that the paintings were probably
the most photographic of Sheeler's works, lacking
the abstract quality of some of his earlier
paintings. Brown found the color "cold
and unexpressive." His criticism was that
the paintings failed to capture the "dynamic
energy hidden within these engines of power,
the potentialities of movement, creation, or
destruction." But in saying that there
was "no longer a question of any such principle
as the relation of art to nature," (Lucic
14). Charles Sheeler died in Dobb’s Ferry,
New York, and May 7, 1965.
Biographical information:
www.bookrags.com/biography/charles-sheeler and
www.artburst.com/charlessheeler. |